If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/candlesugar2/activity/1324772/ is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.