What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body.  safe distance from cell tower  is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.



In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.