If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. what is a safe distance from a cell tower look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. safe distance from cell tower 's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.