If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. safe distance from cell tower is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
https://telegra.ph/How-long-Can-You-Proceed-Coming-from-a-5G-Mobile-Tower-Without-Staying-Unsafe-04-27 on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.